Post: Previous - Next
It's amazing, but the dialogue becomes increasingly absurd and limits of the imagination. He claims to control and censor the formation of the process language and thought. No totalitarian regime was even comes close. No one is safe now. In our society "democratic" can capitare e spesso capita che a fare le spese della prepotenza di regime siano i tanti “signor nessuno” che sommato uno dopo uno diventano Tutti, ma che neppure un predicatore possa fare la sua predica nella madre di tutte le basiliche, il Laterano, davanti al Papa, significa aver ormai superato il livello di guardia. È da chiedersi nel latino classico di Cicerone: “Qousque tandem?”
Ognuno di noi, appena nasce, incomincia lentamente e faticosamente ad apprendere l’uso del linguaggio, un apprendimento che non ha mai fine, perché coincide con il progresso stesso delle nostre conoscenza, nel passaggio continuo da uno stato di “ignoranza” ad una sempre maggiore conoscenza, direttamente proporzionale effort and our will to truth. We use so voluntarily and of course the "language" to translate concepts into our new acquisitions. The philosophy has not yet been able to tell us what really is the language and I doubt that there is or has ever existed on earth for someone who has never really understood what the language is and who can teach so it is a current concept and banal. But what we know is that the language by its very nature is free and proceeds by analogies, figures, metaphors, similes, associations of ideas and mental images.
imagine that someone could act with authority on the infinite connections of neurons and insondabibili is really what makes accaponare skin. It means both a contempt and a total control of man: a contempt for only imagine the possibility, a possibility which would coincide with the end of human freedom itself, of what for centuries has been called the "free will". But if this is even theoretically possible would be the absolute crime that would destroy all the other men could ever make, if just a bit of their residual liberty. What
from Nuremberg on, and only thanks to the arms of the winners, not because it is predicated on the ground that Justice that men always looking and never able to find it, there is no doubt that arose a new religion that seeks to establish itself above all others that have never existed in history: the Holocaust Religio! In Germany alone each year 15,000 people will be prosecuted for the mere crime of opinion. Israel to begin in 1986, strong lobbies of its Diaspora, imposed in 13 different European countries freedom-killing legislation that rejects in full at least two centuries of legal culture, which to begin the revolution of 1989 distinguished between "doing" as a criminal offense illegal or detrimental to concrete and verifiable material interests of others and a mere "thinking" as such is absolutely free and absolutely uncontrollable as well as spiritually necessary and lawful the progress of humanity from its savage stage of a condition that puts freedom as his eschatological stage: freedom from death and from all dependence on the nature or at least freedom to imagine the absolute good.
Well! We have expanded too much and we get dizzy. But it has unleashed Giorgino his incredible arrogance, with its claim to tell him that we can use or can not do the language. We should go to him to know how we can and should express ourselves. The famous "international" Georgie? Yes! Between Israel and Italy! But what does it say about "fame"? And there has to import? Dobbiamp feel awe and be afraid to disagree? Sure, it's someone, even if it says "Father Cantalamessa know personally, instead of which we not only ignore their existence, but even thought it was a fictitious name, a priest who is called" Cantalamessa "seems to be a hoax. And instead is a respectable person, that the 'jew' Georgie knew well, while not understanding that title, since - apparently - Father Cantalamessa not a rabbi, a priest, but "Catholic." Evidently converse. Of course, there is a "dialogue" between Jews and Christians, absurd and unproductive for two thousand years!
Recognize someone the "best intentions" is like giving the stupid, because the error associated with supposed intent. But to give someone a fool conceivable meanings or feel smarter. Cantalamessa does not seem the fool who wants to make it appear. He says a debate has begun:
"If I hit my intention against the sensibilities of Jews and victims of pedophilia, I am sincerely sorry and I apologize, reaffirming my solidarity with one another and with others."as if to say: Gentlemen, I have not intended to offend anyone and if someone feels offended, I apologize to no difficulty. But if - as they say - you have a guilty conscience, the problem is yours, not My. Human nature is such that we can all be seen by Giorgino stupid guy. Not for nothing that Christianity broke off, permanently and irreversibly from Judaism, had introduced the principle of "charity" for which certain relationships are not that stupid-smart, or otherwise, smart-stupid. Here too, we are expanding because we want without facing complex ethical issues that we are already tired to mind, to come in the evening, when we are already tired for other reasons. Let us conclude.
Each line of text Giorgino us open to criticism and would end up writing a page for each of those books that have "international reputation". But we do not want to write books. I will just always set against Giorgino people belonging to Jewish, but we will see much more of the same intelligent Giorgino, although I find little scientific research into the comparative use of this terminology. I mention the first names that come to mind: Jakob Rabkin, that Georgie has even met him in person, also known as Father Cantalamessa. Rabkin know of only one book translated into Italian and I read at least a couple of times. Among the many instructive things that you read on Judaism there is also a better theological-historical perspective of the 'Holocaust'. Those who are interested, if you go on reading. I can not reduce it in a nutshell. But then again right on "Shoah," said Abraham Burg irreverent words, no less authoritative and "famous" to Georgie. Burg was so absurd to believe that the use of the 'Holocaust' was made to induce him to pack up and return to France, which still had the passport.
these characters are each very different, although all agree absurdity of Zionism and its founding myths. Gilad Atzmon occasional articles I read here and there on the net and I'd like to read a full collection of his writings. I myself am willing to do with a publisher, if I am given permission. Him the "Zionist" Wikipedia is careful to say that is an activist against Zionism and in this way to say that having spoken ill of Garibaldi is not the case to take it seriously. Pear in the first place should be of interest to the arguments of each and finally draw the practical consequences, which reach their extreme with Norman G. Finkelstein, in no uncertain terms where it speaks of "Holocaust Industry", to be understood, however, not only in financial aspects, but also in real incomes policies in the case Cantalamessa is revealing: in spite of the name Father Cantalamessa door entry not want to leave it to him sing!
The last stage is that of historical criticism, philosophical, theological. Here there is absolute prohibition protected from criminal sanction. And "strictly" speaking - as Georgie can do - now we expect the vocabulary of state, with the meanings of language are legally permitted. Even the Pope is safe. Went to the synagogue has accepted an affront that no church in the world would have done: stop it and correct it when he speaks ex cathedra! Father Lombardi, who I know has not released any statement, no protest. The "dialogue" must go on! But where to go? Just
Rabkin helps to understand that from a Jewish point of view, non-Zionist, the relationship with Israel is a place of mind, a spiritual place. Nothing to do with a right to "clean etnica”, che un altro ebreo, di nome Ilan Pappe, ha documentato (e non è stato né il primo né il solo) in modo inconfutabile. Si paventa la “distruzione” dello Stato ebraico, ignorando o facendo finta di ignorare un autentico genocidio, una vera e propria distruzione di un popolo, quello palestinese, non nome di un inesistente ed arbitrario diritto. Paradossalmente, lo stato di Israele ha introdotto una sorta di Cittadinanza Trinitaria, dove un ebreo sionista può far valere di volta in volta, come nel gioco delle tre carte, ora la sua appartenza ebraica all’interno delle comunità statuali, ora la stessa cittadinanza che appartiene ai popoli “ospiti” ed infine dal 1948 in poi anche la cittadinanza israeliana, solo che appena se ne voglia servire. Un po’ troppo! Dobbiamo però riconoscere a Giorgino una certa astuzia, avendo compreso da “eccelso sionista” che la corda, se troppo tesa, rischia di rompersi.
0 comments:
Post a Comment