Wednesday, February 17, 2010

Buy Scholl Shoes Singapore

La verità su Nibiru e sul Pianeta X

For 2012, we often hear people talk about the appearance of Nibiru or Planet X and its passage in the solar system, with variations of stories on the move more or less close to Earth.

Sin have appeared since the first books of Zecharia Sirchin Russian, an economist who claims to be an archaeologist, you got to talk about Nibiru, an unlikely giant rocky planet, it would take 3600 years for a revolution.
Briefly, Nibiru was the home planet of an alien race, the Anunnaki, which would have created mankind by a sort of forced genetic mutation, and would therefore become the first Mesopotamian deities.

According to Sitchin's interpretation regarding some steps enum-Elish, this planet was called by the Sumerians Nibiru and Marduk by the Babylonians, and would have played a key role in the altering of the hypothetical primordial solar system. This celestial body belong to our solar system, but its orbit would be considerably different from that of other classical planets known: highly elliptical, somewhat inclined to the ecliptic plane, and retrograde than those of all other planets in the system (ie Nibiru revolves around the Sun in the opposite direction to that of any other planet).
We do not know why, a transit of Nibiru is expected soon. Perhaps because of this expectation is to be found in recent discoveries of "planets" beyond Pluto. It should however be noted that these findings are not due to us at the approach of these heavenly bodies, but only the refinement of research techniques.

Despite all the announcements and statements as to Varuna still there can be no trace of Nibiru (the alleged anomalies in the solar system are easily linked to banal chaotic phenomena, typical of any natural system).
There is also an imaginary movie of Nibiru, taken from a Vatican probe imaginative, such Siloam. The "movie", in reality, it consists essentially of two images reclaiming something undefined.

The story of Nibiru and Siloam was definitely removed any semblance of trust, competent scholars have emphasized different points of view, the many inconsistencies that make this unfortunate pseudo-planet little more than any urban legend.

The objections are numerous and varied, ranging from the overt ignorance on the part of the Akkadian language was enriched by writing the above, and various absurdities contained in these translations, for reasons more purely astronomical and exo-biological and concluded (with the other urban legend named Shiloh) with obvious concepts of telemetry available to anyone who has ever had to do with radar.
short history does not stand, and it takes courage (unconsciousness) to bring it forward.


Essentially, the legends that circulate about Nibiru and Planet X, generally considered the same thing, were born as a result of faulty analysis of a single archaeological archaeologist Zecharia Sitchin, and following the circulation of fake videos and fake news.

It is no coincidence that many archaeologists have been studying the Sumerians, but only Zecharia Sitchin has made those statements, in fact he makes a personal interpretation of some elements of Sumerian mythology, considering the little things in an objective way, and this reduces the reliability his statements. In this regard, in recent years many scholars have pointed out the errors of interpretation of Sitchin, decrying the fact all his work, and no scholar has ever come to its conclusions by studying the same things that he has studied.
When Sitchin
elaborated his theory and published the first texts, the Sumerian language was still poorly understood and known only to a few specialists. But today, thanks to some mass publications such as Sumerian Lexicon has been possible to verify that the translation of individual words to be portions of text are incorrect.
Sitchin's vision of "planetary collision" does no more than superficially reassemble a theory circulating in astronomical environments. But what promises to be Sitchin differ in the details on time, in addition to being scientifically impossible.
Sitchin bases his arguments on his personal interpretation of the Sumerian texts and such things as the interpretation of Sumerian seal called "VA 243. He states that these ancient people had knowledge of the 12 planets, when in fact they were aware of only 5, as has been shown by archaeologists ..
In fact, hundreds of seals and Sumerian calendars have been decoded and the number of planets indicates that each of them is 5.
The seal VA 243 there are 12 dots that Sitchin interprets as planets. Once translated, the seal VA 243 reads: "You are his servant, who is thought to be a noble message to the servant." For serious scholars, the so-called sunshine on VA 243 is not a sun but a star, the dots represent the stars.



In essence, the allegation that Nibiru is a planet and would be known by the Sumerians are contradicted by scholars that (unlike Zecharia Sitchin), study and translate the writings of ancient Mesopotamia.
The Sumerians left very few writings on astronomy. Certainly not the Sumerians knew of the existence of Uranus, Neptune and Pluto. They did not know that the planets orbited around the Sun's claims that the Sumerians had sophisticated astronomy or had a god called Nibiru is a product of the imagination of Sitchin.



It is also interesting to note that the Planet X and Niburu were then assigned a series of catastrophic legends, some cloning the ones for 2000 and other more or less are continuamente riciclate.

Inoltre, l'esistenza di questo fantomatico pianeta scientificamente è impossibile, in quanto le orbite attuali dei pianeti "interni" (Terra compresa) del sistema solare sono troppo stabili e non presentano anomalie (anche minime) in grado di supportare tale ipotesi. Ora per Sitchin & Co. L'ipotetico pianeta dovrebbe avere una massa da 2 a 5 volte quella della Terra ed essere lontano dal Sole da 50 a 100 unità astronomiche. Fino ad oggi nessun corpo celeste si è rivelato oltre l'orbita di Plutone; inoltre, si è dimostrato che le perturbazioni in parte possono essere derivate da errori di calcolo o da margini di imprecisione degli strumenti. Sono solo supposizioni dunque senza il minimo fondamento scientifico. in quasi cinque miliardi di anni (età stimata del Sistema Solare), i pianeti interni avrebbero dovuto avere tutto il tempo necessario per stabilizzare le loro orbite. Oggi le orbite planetarie sono perfettamente conosciute e soprattutto, MOLTO STABILI. Non ci sono anomalie gravitazionali tali da giustificare la possibile presenza di un gigantesco oggetto celeste sconosciuto. Tutte le (piccolissime) anomalie che si registrano sono perfettamente spiegabili con le attuali tecnologie e conoscenze e nulla fa supporre la presenza di altri pianeti (addirittura più grandi di Giove).

Il Sistema solare non una sorta di "club astronico" dove si entra o si esce, o a cui si possono aggiungere membri ogni qualvolta qualcuno senza il minimo fondamento scientific, but only on the basis of their findings proposes cycling the "sensational new discovery."

A planet exerts a gravitational pull with all the consequences clearly demonstrated in astronomy, but obviously those who have invented the hoax of Nibiru or Planet X is not prepared on the subject, as it has ignored the fact that a planet has not any orbit that comes and goes, unless you're talking about a comet or the Death Star of Star Wars.

The inability of the scientific theories of Sitchin was indeed inevitable, in fact, Sitchin is not an astronomer but he launches into astronomical hypothesis, leading figures.



But gli archeologi affermano e dimostrano che le teorie di Sitchin sono completamente errate.

Il fulcro del lavoro di Sitchin si basa principalmente su traduzioni di termini sumerici, accadici, ebraici e babilonesi... il problema è come sono state fatte queste traduzioni. A quanto pare Sitchin ha ignorato alcuni elementi di base di grammatica, come fatto notare da molti, e di fatto Sitchin attribuisce alle parole un significato differente da quello che gli attribuivano gli stessi popoli sumerici e babilonesi. sumeri oltre ad aver inventato la burocrazia, la scuola e una valanga di altre cose hanno anche inventato I DIZIONARI, e molte copie sono arrivate fino a noi... e smentiscono le traduzioni di Sitchin. Ma Sitchin va oltre... trovando connessioni tra miti mesopotamici and stories that simply do not exist in the literature of the period. Keep in mind that when we speak of Sumerian or Babylonian tablets are not talking about a few hundred pieces ... it is estimated that the original writings in cuneiform that we have received, counting both private and museum collections, are about half a million.
fact there is a single table showing the history of beings called Anunnaki living on a planet called Nibiru, as there is a single tablet that speaks of 12 planets in the solar system, and the Mesopotamian astronomical writings that have survived are abundant.

Even the seal carried by Sitchin as a representation of the solar system really is not any of this because it contains errors astronomical abnormal demonstrating that has nothing to do with our Solar System.

also want to see in the seven disks on Sumerian seals the fact that the Earth is the seventh planet of the solar system is another astronomical error: among other things, at most, could be the representation of some constellation, which is very common among the ancients, among other things, the arrangement recalls the star-forming disks in the Pleiades. Always

Sitchin has "found" a number of detailed descriptions made by the Sumerians on the planets of our solar system, only that are highly inaccurate and least imaginative. For example, Sitchin sees as full of life and verdant planets planets like Uranus and Neptune are gas planets and icy, totally devoid of any possibility of life and with temperatures at -215 ° C.

Moreover, it is easy to demonstrate how life would be virtually impossible for the hypothetical planet Nibiru, both in plants and animals. And in part to environmental conditions totally hostile to life, Nibiru would be on a collision course with objects capable of producing real mass extinctions: all forms of complex life, vegetable and animal, would be affected in a fatal Anunnaki included.
And, of course, is not moving in space the axis of the orbit of a hypothetical planet that can give you credibility as an interpreter from dead languages \u200b\u200bto people who have been designated as incompetent by those who do if they wish.


Apart from the fact that there are entire sites dedicated only to show the many errors Sitchin, then simply connect to the "official site" by Sitchin and read the list of his articles and books, to realize that, beyond Nibiru saga, there is not one of his writings in academic, a little 'just for those who want to review the critical existing translations. Besides, Sitchin (which is not mentioned in any scientific publication as an expert in Akkadian) would seem to have made her what was written, years ago, by a researcher, instead, was justly known in this area: only, Jacobsen was not content to restore the traditions Akkadian, not waffle on. According to him, the Anunnaki were some of the local deities, and Nibiru their Olympus. No planet, therefore, no use of gold ground, no "beacon" in Baalbek.
Nothing, that is, free of the claims of those who has become rich by exploiting a certain fashion.

Ultimately, the interpretations given by Sitchin prove groundless. On the other hand, he begins to quibble postulating the identity of the Solar System planets and the gods of antiquity, and his arguments based on what astronomical. But if this assumption would be wrong automatically inferred everything downstream of this can only be inaccurate to say the least. That would explain quite a few things ...
For example, according to another noted scholar of alien presence on Earth in the past, the Italian Valentino Compasses, Marduk was one of many gods in the flesh of the Sumerian pantheon, and had a hearing circular called "car of the four winds." According to Sitchin, however, as that Marduk was invading a planet that, in his view, the texts of the Sumerians called Nibiru, and the "winds" were his natural satellites. Therefore, the interpretation of those passages enum-Elish is far from unique e ben definita.


In sostanza, gli archeologi sono tutti d'accordo che le interpretazioni archeologiche di Sitchin sono errate, mentre gli astronomi sono tutti d'accordo che le interpretazioni astronomiche di Sitchin sono errate. A parte ovviamente qualche pseudo-studioso che ha intenzione di sfruttare i miti inventati da Sitchin per vendere il suo libro e/o farsi pubblicità.

Oltre a tutto ciò, circolano anche una serie di incredibili assurdità astronomiche che in teoria avrebbero l'intenzione di ravvivare la bufala di Nibiru ma in pratica lasciano sgomenti per la loro stupidità, ed infatti ciclicamente e da molti anni vengono mostrate immagini scattate dalla Nasa che vengono spacciate come riprese di Nibiru o Pianeta X, mentre ovviamente riprendono tutt'alto, come normali corpi astronomici, tanto è vero che si ignora sistematicamente l'interpretazione della Nasa e degli astronomi del corpo celeste fotografato. Quello che lascia più perplessi è come la gente preferisca le interpretazioni di persone ignoranti in materia a quelle della Nasa, degli astronomi o degli astrofili, e lascia ancora più perplessi il come si possa pensare che la Nasa e gli astronomi diffondano immagini del fantomatico Nibiru o Pianeta X senza dire nulla o senza riconoscerlo.

Alle bufale delle foto si aggiungono anche altre bufale legate alla manipolazione a proprio piacimento di notizie astronomiche, ignorando la spiegazione della Nasa e degli astronomi. È il caso, ad esempio, the stories they want that the slowdown of the space probes Pioneer and Voyager was caused by the influence of Nibiru or Planet X, as all astronomers, including NASA, they know that the probes have slowed the race because they have crossed the termination shock, in words poor boundaries of the zone of influence of the Sun, which causes a change in the magnetic field and compression, the main causes of the slowdown, among other things planned. In addition, the Voyager probes have surpassed Pioneer because those are faster due to the fact that use propulsion systems and enhanced orbital different pressures.

Incommentabili are then all the crap that you get documents and NASA astronomers to invent footage of a mysterious giant planet approaching, although NASA and astronomers have given ample explanation of what was actually recovered. Exemplary is the case of the planets Venus and Mercury taken by space probes Stereo, despite being passed to Nibiru images were accompanied by adequate explanation and despite NASA would have been easy to verify that it had actually Venus and Mercury.

is still amazing that there was not even a minimum of logic in inventing the buffaloes of the evidence about Nibiru or Planet X, because very often it takes material published by NASA or by astronomers, and already extensively studied by the international community of experts, in this material and you pretend to see a mysterious planet that is approaching us. According to those who say this, there is a conspiracy by NASA and astronomers to cover the existence of this mysterious planet. The proof? Material published by NASA and the astronomers. It is completely illogical.



But not enough: there is ample evidence demonstrating that no Nibiru or Planet X has ever entered our solar system in the past, because if he did would have left many traces of its passage behind it.

is also apparent that the asteroids perturbed from the impending Nibiru are not only those located on its trajectory, but the other places on the sides of them. If, as is believed, Nibiru was moving on an inclined plane to the ecliptic, these planets would abandon their orbital plane and headed for the giant, and most of them, for various inertia, would end up with the dodge.

Now, however, would be to orbit on very different from the original plans, and variously slanted. This, he insists, just every 3600 years, millions upon millions of years, it is elementary to deduce that they should collect a mass of asteroids moving on orbits variously placed in the sky, in addition to an asteroid belt largely dismembered or least disturbed by these repeated transits.
But 95% of the over 341,000 known asteroids (as of September 2006) are arranged neatly around the Sun, on the same orbital plane (not for nothing that we talk about the asteroid ring, which is the so-called Main Belt).

There are several hundred that are nevertheless very close (the love, Apollo, the Trojans), primarily taking elongated ellipses, or, as in the case of the Trojans, moving in the same orbit of Jupiter, but in each case, the their removal from the main beam is clearly attributable to the gravitational influence of Jupiter, the collisions between the asteroids themselves, and so on. And, in fact, almost all of them moving on the orbital planes of slightly differed from that of the ring main (± 15 °).

If a planet Nibiru invader who regularly transit between Mars and Jupiter, the space rock would have to shake it loose and infinitely more, and many of them end up with the move also on retrograde orbits. They know only eight planets of this kind, nothing.
At this point, an astronomer, or an amateur with little but good experience, would have no hesitation in pronouncing its verdict: There is no planet invader.
Those who strive to look for tracks on Earth or on other solar system bodies, in remote passages of Nibiru (which, as mentioned, could easily have a more prosaic explanation, or, at least, be attributable errant bodies to separate from it) should reflect seriously on what has been said now, since the asteroids are the final test, incontrovertible.

Not to mention that the same false evidence about Nibiru or Planet X is such that if it were true then all the many astronomers around the world have already identified the likely presence of this celestial body, and certainly an imaginary plot to silence all astronomers world is as you might think impossible.

Furthermore, the existence of Nibiru or Planet X is inherently impossible, as only the possibility of its existence violates laws astronomical SHOW.



The connection of Nibiru hoax to hoax of 2012 took place in a very particular way. Nancy Lieder, an unlikely psychic who claims to channel messages from the aliens, wrote on his website ZetaTalk that the inhabitants of an imaginary planet of the star Zeta Reticuli had warned that the Earth was in danger because of Planet X or Nibiru. This catastrophe was originally scheduled for May 2003 but nothing happened when the date of the end of the world was moved to December 2012.



few years in the UFO and esoteric circles there is much talk about a hypothetical, that great historic event, according to forecasts of Maya, should take place in December of 2012. The assumptions on the nature of that change are the most diverse, and among them we also find that for which in that year you will have to arrive at perihelion of the planet Nibiru, with all the planetary disasters implied by the transition.

Grace astronomy, it is easy to calculate the position where it should be the elusive Nibiru if you rinse them to us, and any calculation shows that the planet should already be entered in the Solar System for some time to get close to us in December 2012, and therefore should already be visible for years.
For example, in early 2007 Nibiru should already be at a slightly greater distance from the Sun than the orbit of a hypothetical planet located halfway between the orbits of Saturn and Uranus.

Therefore, since the beginning of 2007, a massive planet and has its own radiant energy which would be expected Nibiru apparent brightness between those specified for Saturn and Uranus, and then it would have been visible to the naked eye. Instead, in early 2009 should have appeared as one of the brightest celestial bodies in the sky.

short, it is reasonable to assume that if a planet such as Nibiru would actually arrive here in late 2012 should be visible to the naked eye for years. It should already be detected by even before the astronomical instruments now also available at the time astronomers.

Maybe some astronomers "know" and keep silent? This idea should be reflected easily fall (in addition to the above article) that in the world of amateur "free and uncontrolled" there are hundreds of thousands, and very difficult for them and their equipment (which, it is good to do this, here and there in the sky much more of the means of astronomical observatories) could miss something so close and eye-catching, thanks to the Internet and the spread of news of the discovery of something new would be around the world in a moment.

And so it is in fact, come quando un osservatorio nel mondo scopre un asteroide vicino alla Terra o altro, anzi si fa la corsa a rivendicare la scoperta!

Chi sospetta cospirazioni omertose degli astronomi e blatera di "telescopi censurati" con riferimento al presunto pianeta Nibiru dovrebbe farsi una bella dose di realtà, perché il mondo astronomico funziona come descritto sopra: appena si fa una scoperta, si corre ad annunciarla, per conquistarne la paternità.



Anche se lo volesse, un fantomatico governo cospiratore non potrebbe tenere segreto Nibiru. Se fosse reale, verrebbe seguito da migliaia di astronomi, sia professionisti sia amatoriali. Questi astronomi sono ovunque nel mondo. La comunità degli astronomi è formed by scientists who would keep a secret even if not ordering them to. It is simply impossible to hide a planet that comes close to the inner solar system!



In short: Nibiru is a myth without any basis in fact. To an astronomer, persistent claims about a planet that is "close" but "invisible" are just stupid.


Here is a scientific research that demonstrates the impossibility of the existence of Nibiru:

http://www.cifas.net/ricerche/Nibiru2.pdf

available HERE if the link does not work

And a research that demonstrates how Sitchin's translations are wrong (there are many detailed analysis):

http://www.sitchiniswrong.com/sitchiniswrongcontentpage.htm

Here we demonstrate how Sitchin's translations are wrong:

http://www.ianlawton.com/mes6c.htm

Among other things a few years ago he addressed the question of Nibiru in full:

http://www.cifas.net/ricerche/QUESTIONI_CELESTI.pdf

available HERE if the link does not work

More Links can also read this:

http://www.cun-italia.net/taccuino/NibiruNew.pdf

available HERE if the link does not work

and this: http://www

.cpegenova.org / Sumerian-MarcoDiFalco.pdf

even if I want to read one of the many opinions of competent people who are moving but are systematically ignored, what follows is an opinion from an astrophysicist:

Click here

and as icing on the cake board to read even this short paper:

http://attivissimo.blogspot.com/2008/09/catastrofe-del-giorno-in-arrivo-il.html

and also this:

http://complottismo.blogspot. com/2009/02/il-vaticano-nello-spazio.html

there are absurdities in the extreme case, Nibiru, how to pass off this planet does not exist what are the images of the sun produced by internal reflections often known objective come lens flare, come è spiegato in questo articolo:

http://attivissimo.blogspot.com/2009/09/ho-fotografato-il-pianeta-nibiru.html

È anche da ricordare come la NASA abbia scritto un apposito articolo dove smonta con i fatti le fantasie catastrofiste sul 2012 e sull'arrivo del pianeta Nibiru:

http://astrobiology.nasa.gov/ask-an-astrobiologist/intro/nibiru-and-doomsday-2012-questions-and-answers

Qui trovate la sua traduzione in italiano: Le risposte della NASA sul 2012 e su Nibiru



Esiste anche un lavoro in italiano che dimostra dettagliatamente le falsità di Sitchin:

http://nemsisprojectresearch.blogspot.com/2009/10/le-falsita-di-sitchin-capitolo-i.html

In this article, very complete, the author has set out some steps, where Sitchin has translated so forcibly wrong, a few steps. To make it appear, for example, that in the battle between Horus and Seth, the first is increased on the Sun, the disc ... instead of "on" disc.
Sitchin's intent is then to believe that in this case there were descriptions of flying saucers already written in Sumerian, which is not true at all.
rereading many passages of the article are many steps like that. In the famous seal VA243
for example, does not translate the writing on the sides that expose rather because no mention of the twelfth planet, but would the artist's signature, the customer e dei sacerdoti. Inoltre l'astro stellato non è il Sole, che i sumeri scolpivano in modo differente, ma bensì una stella, probabilmente Sirio, che corrisponde all'iconografia che utilizzavano per tale stella come dimostrato in altri sigilli.

In sostanza, l'articolo mostra bene che Sitchin ha letteralmente inventato congetture partendo da racconti di natura puramente mitologica, analizzando e "contraffacendo" in molte parti le traduzioni sumere al fine di dimostrare quello che poi non esiste.


Molto significativo il noto evento seguente:

http://attivissimo.blogspot.com/2009/07/che-cosa-sta-succedendo-su-giove.html

Alla faccia di chi blatera di una congiura del silenzio degli astronomi di tutto il mondo per nascondere l'imminente, letale arrivo del pianeta Nibiru, è stato proprio un astrofilo australiano, ossia una persona comune con l'hobby dell'astronomia, ad accorgersi per primo di un sorprendente fenomeno: una macchia scura comparsa improvvisamente su Giove e grande grosso modo quanto la Terra: era il segno dell'impatto di una cometa o asteroide su Giove.



Ma esiste in astronomia il Pianeta X (Planet X)? Tutti i dati confermano che non esiste, la sua esistenza è dovuta a delle ipotesi e a delle speculazioni dovute alla possibile presenza di altri pianeti oltre Plutone, smentite dalle nuove scoperte.

In passato si fecero molte speculazioni secondo cui sarebbe potuto exist, among which it is invoked as an explanation of the observed anomalies in the orbit of Neptune at the beginning it was thought that Pluto may be the Planet X, but its mass was not sufficient to explain the observed anomalies in the orbit of Neptune, so the search continued. However, the apparent discrepancies were resolved when the space probe Voyager 2 discovered that the mass of Neptune had been miscalculated. Taking into account the new mass of Neptune, there was no need to explain an unknown planet's orbit.
And the new astronomical discoveries have finally put an end to any speculation about a possible Planet X
fact, have been discovered and studied more than a few small celestial bodies the last known planet of our solar system, rather start from Pluto, a number of items - for which he coined the definition of trans-Neptunian object - orbiting the Sun and are blurring the distinction between planets and asteroids (the same Pluto , August 24, 2006, was downgraded from planet to dwarf planet ninth.

This of course does not avoid that every new discovery is hailed as one of the tenth planet, trying to attract public interest with this kind of sensationalism, and are often sources also set to do so (who then recanted).

In fact, all data collected clearly show the presence of small celestial objects, dwarf planets and asteroids beyond the orbit Pluto, which obviously have nothing in common with the fictional Nibiru, all have normal orbit, even though on some source sensationalist someone speculated above.

Here are the heavenly bodies beyond Pluto, with related links for further information:





http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eris_ Eris (astronomy)

Sedna

http:// it.wikipedia.org/wiki/90377_Sedna

50000 Quaoar Makemake

http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/50000_Quaoar



http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Makemake_ (astronomy)

Haumea

http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haumea_ (astronomy)

Orcus

http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/90482_Orcus

Varuna

http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/20000_Varuna

0 comments:

Post a Comment