Homepage
We try to do to the next level in our monitoring of the Zionist ideology and its transmission channels today. We will try to overcome the feeling of aversion and moral reaction to this doctrine that inspires us as they understand its nature, to assume the costume that is characteristic of science: cum sine ira et studio. As for Sergio I. Minerbi not say whether it is the most representative in terms that we try to single out here, that the Zionist political theology. Say "Zionist and Jewish or not Jewish, because after a repeated reading of the book Rabkin we believe that Judaism and Zionism and Judaism are other thing that is clearly be distinguished, while being able to do a critique of Judaism, which basically coincides with an earlier critical Catholic, the pre-Council, to understand, but which may also conduct a critique from a religious point of view of the ancient greek-roman, or generated by the philosophical point of view or from the perspective of a non-monotheistic religion. Since no one lives outside of space and time, we believe that dutifully while pursuing the objective as possible, we can not get out of the human condition.
Vers
1.0/20.2.10
Previous / Next
Contents: 1. Christianization of the Holocaust or rather ebraizzazione of Christianity? - 2. The issue of refugees. -
1. Christianization of the Holocaust or rather ebraizzazione of Christianity? - I was so far vaguely aware of the emergence of a new religion which, starting from Auschwitz, not a historical fact Pià for investigation and study with the usual tools of research and historical criticism, but a fact with which the meta-historical figure of Christ was sent down from the Cross and its juice was placed on a cabalistic number: a 6 followed by six zeros. Perhaps, if we consider this ritual meaning is clear why the number of victims of the concentration camps can not even be a little different. Criminal law introduced many lobbyists AESI are now taking penalties, which most do not have centuries to those who have been the dogma of the Catholic Church: virginity and assumption into heaven of Mary, the mystery of the Trinity, the Deity of Christ , the consecrated Host, and so on. I interpreted the phenomenon as an intrusion of Judaism in the lobbying body of doctrine of Catholicism and its subordination to the Synagogue. If you fail to recognize the political-religious event Auschwitz, you can not understand the periodic persecution of Williamson's turn.
But now I discover a ' analysis of an expert in the Hebrew or Jewish, Sergio I. Minerbi, a name that I read at other times, a different representation of the same facts, a different viewing angle. Meanwhile, it is surprising so much interest and so much fury for what should be a completely internal to the Catholic Church: the proclamation of his saints. This, in my opinion, very little interest to Catholics themselves, which is distinguished by a very wide range nell'oltre one billion people are nominally Catholic. Maybe actually practicing Catholics, those for which la parola del papa ha quasi valore di un ordine sono assai pochi, pochissimi in realtà. Ciò spiegherebbe la debolezza della gerarchia cattolica e la sua vulnerabilità a pressioni scientificamente organizzate come quelle che vengono dalle lobbies ebraiche, che hanno già ampia esperienza nel controllo dei politici.
Gli ebrei, ma qui il nome pone qualche problema, sono dunque più interessati alla proclamazione dei santi cattolici che non gli stessi cattolici. È un fatto non difficile da verificare. E perché? Non è facile dirlo e non ho la pretesa di saperlo. Lascio in sospeso questo punto e vado invece a ciò che ha oggi attratto la mia attenzione. È per me insolita la visione che leggo in Minerbi secondo cui la chiesa Catholic would "appropriated" the Holocaust, almost juicy business deals made political and religious. I do not have the numbers of pilgrimages to Auschwitz, but I think they can compete or are comparable to traditional Catholic pilgrimages (Lourdes, Fatima, etc.)..
points in the text of Minerbi puzzle me are many. Meanwhile, if based on a principle of reasonableness, we can well understand that the Jews of today can not be the same perpetrators who killed about 2000 years ago Christ, it is not clear what would be left of Christianity if it is not the most religious dogma that not historical in the strict sense that Jesus Christ was crucified by the Jews. The "myth" in the greek-roman culture aveva un senso profondo e rispettabile che oggi non conserva più nel nostro linguaggio corrente e si rischia non poco quando si usa questo termine in relazione ad eventi della nostra epoca. E dunque il “mito” della morte in croce di Cristo per mano ebraica ha il suo più logico senso in quello di un “superamento” definitivo ed irreversibile del cristianesimo rispetto all’ebraismo. Come esiste un problema di tutela del consumatore, ne esiste uno analogo di tutela del credente, che non può essere preso per i fondelli, facendo oggi credere l’opposto di quello che ha sempre creduto e domani ancora il contrario.
Uno potrebbe anche non credere a nulla di tutto ciò: né a cristiani né Jews. But unfortunately the return to the beautiful religion that was the Greeks and Romans is forever foreclosed and no longer seems possible. The ancient gods were slaughtered with no mercy and no respect for their human worshipers. Maybe that was the first genocide of humanity and unsurpassed. The demolition of the ancient gods with all his faithful, still branded as "idolaters" and no court shall recognize and defend their rights. Indeed their only right is the contempt for everyone else, have an obligation to render them. These are faithful to the One God, who disputes its uniqueness among those who believe it is their only true God, and thus entered the great era of intolerance. If God is One ends up losing all credibility will be our world without any semblance of God, or rather without even the pretense that it still remains wearily by force of inertia s oprattutto a popular credulity that he can not rise the sophistry of theology. Perhaps the one true God who rules the whole is called Mammon. Take the money and see what remains.
Another curious thing that caught my attention the expert of the Jewish side, the aforementioned Minerbi, is the rejection of a distinction for me quite obvious that between anti-Semitism and anti-Judaism. Certainly not permitted in the first as it may be synonymous with racism, persecution, discrimination, prejudice then able to determine who are the Semites in the true sense. I think they are above the current Palestinians, who are certainly not the most beloved in our time and experience a real genocide is taking place and that is before our eyes, intent on watching the genocide who were and those who do not am. The amtigiudaismo is absolutely a legitimate criticism of religion. If I can not be "charged", having been slaughtered and destroyed all the ancient places of worship, and it is increasingly difficult to be Catholic, it certainly would not want to see me circumcised jew, even if a well-known politician has already launched the slogan: "We all Jews. "
2 . The refugee issue . - We have probably the wrong card. Minerbi not a theologian and sees things from a pragmatic point of view. What interests us here is to detect its affermazioner in response to Arrigo Levi, according to which Palestinian refugees if they want peace at least have a right to forget to return to their homes, where they were expelled in 1948. It is appalling that a perverse way of thinking - to Minerbi, which takes the counter, but maybe not the same as before, if a Zionist as Arrigo Levi is even considered a person that must be answered, and is treated with disdain, because it is not doubts that it is a "friend of Israele”, disscrimine di ogni criterio di eticità.
(segue)
We try to do to the next level in our monitoring of the Zionist ideology and its transmission channels today. We will try to overcome the feeling of aversion and moral reaction to this doctrine that inspires us as they understand its nature, to assume the costume that is characteristic of science: cum sine ira et studio. As for Sergio I. Minerbi not say whether it is the most representative in terms that we try to single out here, that the Zionist political theology. Say "Zionist and Jewish or not Jewish, because after a repeated reading of the book Rabkin we believe that Judaism and Zionism and Judaism are other thing that is clearly be distinguished, while being able to do a critique of Judaism, which basically coincides with an earlier critical Catholic, the pre-Council, to understand, but which may also conduct a critique from a religious point of view of the ancient greek-roman, or generated by the philosophical point of view or from the perspective of a non-monotheistic religion. Since no one lives outside of space and time, we believe that dutifully while pursuing the objective as possible, we can not get out of the human condition.
Vers
1.0/20.2.10
Previous / Next
Contents: 1. Christianization of the Holocaust or rather ebraizzazione of Christianity? - 2. The issue of refugees. - 1. Christianization of the Holocaust or rather ebraizzazione of Christianity? - I was so far vaguely aware of the emergence of a new religion which, starting from Auschwitz, not a historical fact Pià for investigation and study with the usual tools of research and historical criticism, but a fact with which the meta-historical figure of Christ was sent down from the Cross and its juice was placed on a cabalistic number: a 6 followed by six zeros. Perhaps, if we consider this ritual meaning is clear why the number of victims of the concentration camps can not even be a little different. Criminal law introduced many lobbyists AESI are now taking penalties, which most do not have centuries to those who have been the dogma of the Catholic Church: virginity and assumption into heaven of Mary, the mystery of the Trinity, the Deity of Christ , the consecrated Host, and so on. I interpreted the phenomenon as an intrusion of Judaism in the lobbying body of doctrine of Catholicism and its subordination to the Synagogue. If you fail to recognize the political-religious event Auschwitz, you can not understand the periodic persecution of Williamson's turn.
But now I discover a ' analysis of an expert in the Hebrew or Jewish, Sergio I. Minerbi, a name that I read at other times, a different representation of the same facts, a different viewing angle. Meanwhile, it is surprising so much interest and so much fury for what should be a completely internal to the Catholic Church: the proclamation of his saints. This, in my opinion, very little interest to Catholics themselves, which is distinguished by a very wide range nell'oltre one billion people are nominally Catholic. Maybe actually practicing Catholics, those for which la parola del papa ha quasi valore di un ordine sono assai pochi, pochissimi in realtà. Ciò spiegherebbe la debolezza della gerarchia cattolica e la sua vulnerabilità a pressioni scientificamente organizzate come quelle che vengono dalle lobbies ebraiche, che hanno già ampia esperienza nel controllo dei politici.
Gli ebrei, ma qui il nome pone qualche problema, sono dunque più interessati alla proclamazione dei santi cattolici che non gli stessi cattolici. È un fatto non difficile da verificare. E perché? Non è facile dirlo e non ho la pretesa di saperlo. Lascio in sospeso questo punto e vado invece a ciò che ha oggi attratto la mia attenzione. È per me insolita la visione che leggo in Minerbi secondo cui la chiesa Catholic would "appropriated" the Holocaust, almost juicy business deals made political and religious. I do not have the numbers of pilgrimages to Auschwitz, but I think they can compete or are comparable to traditional Catholic pilgrimages (Lourdes, Fatima, etc.)..
points in the text of Minerbi puzzle me are many. Meanwhile, if based on a principle of reasonableness, we can well understand that the Jews of today can not be the same perpetrators who killed about 2000 years ago Christ, it is not clear what would be left of Christianity if it is not the most religious dogma that not historical in the strict sense that Jesus Christ was crucified by the Jews. The "myth" in the greek-roman culture aveva un senso profondo e rispettabile che oggi non conserva più nel nostro linguaggio corrente e si rischia non poco quando si usa questo termine in relazione ad eventi della nostra epoca. E dunque il “mito” della morte in croce di Cristo per mano ebraica ha il suo più logico senso in quello di un “superamento” definitivo ed irreversibile del cristianesimo rispetto all’ebraismo. Come esiste un problema di tutela del consumatore, ne esiste uno analogo di tutela del credente, che non può essere preso per i fondelli, facendo oggi credere l’opposto di quello che ha sempre creduto e domani ancora il contrario.
Uno potrebbe anche non credere a nulla di tutto ciò: né a cristiani né Jews. But unfortunately the return to the beautiful religion that was the Greeks and Romans is forever foreclosed and no longer seems possible. The ancient gods were slaughtered with no mercy and no respect for their human worshipers. Maybe that was the first genocide of humanity and unsurpassed. The demolition of the ancient gods with all his faithful, still branded as "idolaters" and no court shall recognize and defend their rights. Indeed their only right is the contempt for everyone else, have an obligation to render them. These are faithful to the One God, who disputes its uniqueness among those who believe it is their only true God, and thus entered the great era of intolerance. If God is One ends up losing all credibility will be our world without any semblance of God, or rather without even the pretense that it still remains wearily by force of inertia s oprattutto a popular credulity that he can not rise the sophistry of theology. Perhaps the one true God who rules the whole is called Mammon. Take the money and see what remains.
Another curious thing that caught my attention the expert of the Jewish side, the aforementioned Minerbi, is the rejection of a distinction for me quite obvious that between anti-Semitism and anti-Judaism. Certainly not permitted in the first as it may be synonymous with racism, persecution, discrimination, prejudice then able to determine who are the Semites in the true sense. I think they are above the current Palestinians, who are certainly not the most beloved in our time and experience a real genocide is taking place and that is before our eyes, intent on watching the genocide who were and those who do not am. The amtigiudaismo is absolutely a legitimate criticism of religion. If I can not be "charged", having been slaughtered and destroyed all the ancient places of worship, and it is increasingly difficult to be Catholic, it certainly would not want to see me circumcised jew, even if a well-known politician has already launched the slogan: "We all Jews. "
2 . The refugee issue . - We have probably the wrong card. Minerbi not a theologian and sees things from a pragmatic point of view. What interests us here is to detect its affermazioner in response to Arrigo Levi, according to which Palestinian refugees if they want peace at least have a right to forget to return to their homes, where they were expelled in 1948. It is appalling that a perverse way of thinking - to Minerbi, which takes the counter, but maybe not the same as before, if a Zionist as Arrigo Levi is even considered a person that must be answered, and is treated with disdain, because it is not doubts that it is a "friend of Israele”, disscrimine di ogni criterio di eticità.
(segue)
0 comments:
Post a Comment